Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
- From: Knut Reinert <knut.reinert@fu-berlin.de>
- To: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:17:53 +0200
- Reply-to: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
- Subject: Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
Hi Fabian, I guess this is still not well posed. Assume { [4,8], [1,5], [6,10]} the second and third do not overlap. What should be the result? [4,10] ? or [1,8] and [6,10] ? On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Fabian Buske wrote: > I start of with a set of intervals. That is a set of pairs of integers > defining the interval start and end point. This two integers do not > necessarily span the same range in all the intervals in the set. > > I then like to merge all overlapping/intersecting intervals. This may be > done on the fly while constructing a new data structure.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
- From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
- References:
- [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
- From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
- From: Knut Reinert <knut.reinert@fu-berlin.de>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
- From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
- [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
-
seqan-dev - September 2010 - Archives indexes sorted by:
[ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] - Complete archive of the seqan-dev mailing list
- More info on this list...