[Seqan-dev] Bug in FragmentStore?
- From: Mat <matthias.dodt@mdc-berlin.de>
- To: seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:52:10 +0100
- Reply-to: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
- Subject: [Seqan-dev] Bug in FragmentStore?
Hi guys! I think there is a problem with the fragment store reading paired-end reads from SAM. The pairMatchIDs seem to be assigned incorrectly. As an input i used a sam file with the following statistics: 87323 in total 0 QC failure 0 duplicates 86119 mapped (98.62%) 87323 paired in sequencing 43662 read1 43661 read2 86965 properly paired (99.59%) 86002 with itself and mate mapped 117 singletons (0.13%) 3341 with mate mapped to a different chr 3242 with mate mapped to a different chr (mapQ>=5) The code...: ... unsigned int nrAlignments = length(fragStore.alignedReadStore),mateCounter=0,spanMateCnt=0; sortAlignedReads(fragStore.alignedReadStore, SortReadId()); for (unsigned int n=0;n<nrAlignments;++n){ TValue pair_id = fragStore.alignedReadStore[n].pairMatchId; TValue currentReadId=fragStore.alignedReadStore[n].readId; if(pair_id!=TReadStoreElement::INVALID_ID){ std::cout << "read-id: " << currentReadId << std::endl; std::cout << "pair-id: " << pair_id << std::endl; //get mate read-id TValue r1 = fragStore.matePairStore[pair_id].readId[0]; TValue r2 = fragStore.matePairStore[pair_id].readId[1]; //now r1 or r2 should equal currentReadId if((r1!=currentReadId)&&(r2!=currentReadId)){ std::cout << "Wrong mate association" << std::endl; } else { ++spanMateCnt; } } } } ... It turns out that the both pair_id's never match and the loop breaks with: >>Trying to access an element behind the last one! << Any suggestions? thanks! best, mat |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Seqan-dev] Bug in FragmentStore?
- From: "Holtgrewe, Manuel" <manuel.holtgrewe@fu-berlin.de>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] Bug in FragmentStore?
-
seqan-dev - January 2011 - Archives indexes sorted by:
[ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] - Complete archive of the seqan-dev mailing list
- More info on this list...