On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:04 AM, Thomas Arp wrote: >> Your patch is fine except for the usleep quirk. I don't know whether we >> care about non-GNU compilation on Windows, but if we do, we should not >> use usleep on Windows (as I said up there). >> > O.K:, i changed this. Before we decide applying the patch, have you actually tested the changes with real hardware? Are you able to upload and download tracks on Windows with the changes? I might also test your changes on Linux and MacOS, but if you just verify the functionality on Windows, I would already be pleased ;). Adrian