[RQC-interest] Review Quality Collector (RQC) status update August 2015

["Lutz Prechelt" <prechelt@inf.fu-berlin.de>]

In the previous update [1], I told you that 
I have started discussions with some journal editors in 
order to learn more about what an actual review quality definition
might look like.

What happened since?

I have now seriously started to work towards a software implementation.
The first step will be the (much simpler) version of RQC for conferences
(RQCconf).
Then I will develop that into the full version for journals (RQC proper).
As a first functional part I have implemented reading a review quality
definition from an RTF file, using a human-friendly format that will help
discussing an emerging review quality definitions among the PC chairs 
(or journal editors) of one conference (journal).

You can get a rough itemized look at the implementation status at [2].


And finally, as usual:
Please tell me if you know anybody else who may like to be
on this mailing list [3].

  Lutz

[1] https://lists.fu-berlin.de/pipermail/rqc-interest/2015/msg00001.html
[2] http://www.mi.fu-berlin.de/w/SE/RQCconf#Software_implementation_status 
[3] https://lists.fu-berlin.de/listinfo/rqc-interest
    (you can subscribe here)