In the previous update [1], I shared an anecdote about RQC becoming mainstream. Today I would like to direct your attention to an upcoming article about RQC, RRP, and Publons: A writer for Science asked me for an interview, which we then did, and which he will use for a piece for Science Careers [2] about services that allow researchers to get credit for their peer reviews. (I am not sure when it will appear.) RRP, the Reviewer Recognition Platform [3], is the Elsevier project (that I also worked with) that counts your reviews for many journals and collects and presents status and badges on a private or public website. Publons [4] is a company from New Zealand that does roughly the same thing in a different manner and with optional publishing of reviews and post-publication reviews tacked on. Please tell me if you know anybody else who may like to be on this mailing list [5]. Lutz [1] https://lists.fu-berlin.de/pipermail/rqc-interest/2015/msg00003.html [2] http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/ [3] http://www.reviewerrecognition.elsevier.com/ [4] https://publons.com/ [5] https://lists.fu-berlin.de/listinfo/rqc-interest (you can subscribe here)