From cheinan@multiproc.com Mon Feb 15 21:44:34 2010 Received: from relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.67]) by list1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Nh7o1-00042z-2T>; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:44:33 +0100 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Nh7o0-0003pt-Tl>; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:44:33 +0100 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2 [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199F7E0E9F for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:44:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:44:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=wzNqILS5Ub/Ok6M0e+qvcGfIZDQ=; b=kyxX6kPk2Hv5meTu+Er9VJi+cywntiFlcRli7tLR9Ryx98OUsi6aQzBAT/72N70qs3FXxPE0i5bQH4tgZMLaVbY3Lx9iJmwcOMdiHQz/7lF+16uvGbkdi/NbvF9J/KR1e+yBgjtDauP6uxWCB6jQsP89V+A9lBm5wFyke2Bgwf0= X-Sasl-enc: RrVHgzfsbMMVdR95N59XrV9ayub9FBaG+41oCrP+ou6Z 1266266671 Received: from [10.0.2.15] (216-15-51-223.c3-0.slvr-ubr1.lnh-slvr.md.cable.rcn.com [216.15.51.223]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92441FE97 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:44:31 -0500 (EST) From: Cheinan Marks To: seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Multiproc LLC Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:44:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1266266671.2409.4.camel@VirtualUbuntu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 66.111.4.26 X-purgate: clean X-purgate-ID: 151147::1266266673-00000DDD-48B7CC6D/0-0/0-0 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.001712, version=1.1.6 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 on Algerien.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS Subject: [Seqan-dev] NCBI Integration X-BeenThere: seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: SeqAn Development List-Id: SeqAn Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:44:34 -0000 Dear Seqan Team, I am checking out SeqAn and am really impressed by the way you're using the C++ generic programming features. I looked at your roadmap tab on your Trac server at http://trac.mi.fu-berlin.de/seqan/roadmap and didn't find an answer, nor did I see anything in the docs, so I'm asking here: What if any, are your plans for integrating SeqAn with NCBI ASN.1 format and algorithms such as BLAST for local alignments? Thanks. Cheinan Marks Multiproc LLC From j.reid@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk Tue Feb 16 12:25:38 2010 Received: from relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.67]) by list1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NhLYe-0007Eg-VI>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:25:37 +0100 Received: from adora-ext.cryst.bbk.ac.uk ([193.61.32.13] helo=adora.cryst.bbk.ac.uk) by relay1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) for seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1NhLYe-0007fR-R8>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:25:36 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (axon-ext.cryst.bbk.ac.uk [193.61.32.77]) by adora.cryst.bbk.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1GBe9ct019090 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:40:11 GMT Message-ID: <4B7A80AB.8090008@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:25:31 +0000 From: John Reid User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cryst-BBK-MailScanner-Information: Please contact CCSG for more information (http://www. cryst.bbk.ac.uk/CCSG) X-Cryst-BBK-MailScanner-ID: o1GBe9ct019090 X-Cryst-BBK-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Cryst-BBK-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, required 5, autolearn=not spam) X-Cryst-BBK-MailScanner-From: j.reid@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk X-Cryst-BBK-MailScanner-Watermark: 1266925212.2903@KXl7BrWhYY1P1/pfjoFlJA X-Originating-IP: 193.61.32.13 X-purgate: clean X-purgate-ID: 151147::1266319536-00000DDD-48014F5F/0-0/0-0 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.198359, version=1.1.6 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 on Burundi.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS Subject: [Seqan-dev] trac still working? X-BeenThere: seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: SeqAn Development List-Id: SeqAn Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:25:38 -0000 Hi, Is the trac still being used? I know there is still a spamming problem on it. I have a few issues I raised there a while ago: http://trac.mi.fu-berlin.de/seqan/ticket/249 http://trac.mi.fu-berlin.de/seqan/ticket/250 http://trac.mi.fu-berlin.de/seqan/ticket/251 http://trac.mi.fu-berlin.de/seqan/ticket/259 I don't know if I would have been better off raising them on this email list? Regards, John.