FU Logo
  • Startseite
  • Kontakt
  • Impressum
  • Home
  • Listenauswahl
  • Anleitungen

Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals

<-- thread -->
<-- date -->
  • From: Knut Reinert <knut.reinert@fu-berlin.de>
  • To: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:17:53 +0200
  • Reply-to: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
  • Subject: Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals

Hi Fabian,

I guess this is still not  well posed.

Assume { [4,8], [1,5], [6,10]}

the second and third do not overlap. What should be the result?

[4,10]  ?

or 

[1,8] and [6,10]

?


On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Fabian Buske wrote:

> I start of with a set of intervals. That is a set of pairs of integers 
> defining the interval start and end point. This two integers do not 
> necessarily span the same range in all the intervals in the set.
> 
> I then like to merge all overlapping/intersecting intervals. This may be 
> done on the fly while constructing a new data structure.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<-- thread -->
<-- date -->
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
      • From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
  • References:
    • [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
      • From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
    • Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
      • From: Knut Reinert <knut.reinert@fu-berlin.de>
    • Re: [Seqan-dev] Merging/Melting a bunch of intervals
      • From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
  • seqan-dev - September 2010 - Archives indexes sorted by:
    [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
  • Complete archive of the seqan-dev mailing list
  • More info on this list...

Hilfe

  • FAQ
  • Dienstbeschreibung
  • ZEDAT Beratung
  • postmaster@lists.fu-berlin.de

Service-Navigation

  • Startseite
  • Listenauswahl

Einrichtung Mailingliste

  • ZEDAT-Portal
  • Mailinglisten Portal