[Seqan-dev] comparison to python

From: Bernd Jagla &lt; bernd.jagla@pasteur.fr &gt;
To: seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:32:35 +0100
Reply-to: SeqAn Development &lt; seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de &gt;
Subject: [Seqan-dev] comparison to python

Bernd Jagla <bernd.jagla@pasteur.fr> · Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:32:35 +0100

Hi,

this is just to warn you that there WILL be more questions coming... ;)

I just got the results back from a comparison between a simple seqan 

fastq reader and python version of such and it turns out that seqan is 

almost 100% faster : 13:38 min vs. 6:55 with the same CPU load and 

system resources being used...

Thanks for this nice tool....

Looking forward,

Bernd