Re: [Seqan-dev] question about the efficiency of the sequan sequence classes
- From: John Reid <j.reid@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
- To: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:15:53 +0100
- Reply-to: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
- Subject: Re: [Seqan-dev] question about the efficiency of the sequan sequence classes
Hi Rene, That looks like an interesting test but I think it is worth pointing out that it is not always best to pass-by-value as you assume. If you're interested Dave Abrahams explains why in this article: http://cpp-next.com/archive/2009/08/want-speed-pass-by-value/ Regards, John. On 13/09/13 11:34, Rahn, René wrote:
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Seqan-dev] question about the efficiency of the sequan sequence classes
- From: John Reid <j.reid@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] question about the efficiency of the sequan sequence classes
- References:
- Re: [Seqan-dev] question about the efficiency of the sequan sequence classes
- From: Bartha Dániel <daniel.bartha@gmail.com>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] question about the efficiency of the sequan sequence classes
- From: Rahn, René <rene.maerker@fu-berlin.de>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] question about the efficiency of the sequan sequence classes
-
seqan-dev - September 2013 - Archives indexes sorted by:
[ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] - Complete archive of the seqan-dev mailing list
- More info on this list...