Hi Fabian, > I made another observation that seems > strange. I run swift on a bunch of sequences (Finder). However, only the > first sequence will ever get a match. > Looking at you swiftlocal app I see that you call > > Pattern<TQGramIndex, Swift<SwiftLocal> > pattern_swift(index_qgram); > > in the inner loop. This probably resets something in the object that is > crucial to the program. I was wondering if it wouldn't make sense to > "reuse" the already instantiated object and "just" reset what ever > required? Or is there a special reason to do it this way? I think it > used to work (with seqan release 1.2). Yes, one needed to re-initialize the pattern. Reusing the object was only possible with the semi-global version until now. But as I planned to have a look at it soon anyway, I now fixed it for the local version. > The swiftlocal app currently > doesn't compile so I couldn't just give it a go and try what happens > when the line mentioned above is initialized outside the loop. Normally, it should compile. I recently moved the file from the demos folder to the apps folder. Have you updated all files to the current version? Cheers, Birte