Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftPattern reinit required
- From: "Kehr, Birte" <Birte.Kehr@fu-berlin.de>
- To: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:44:22 +0200
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
- Reply-to: SeqAn Development <seqan-dev@lists.fu-berlin.de>
- Subject: Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftPattern reinit required
Hi Fabian, > I made another observation that seems > strange. I run swift on a bunch of sequences (Finder). However, only the > first sequence will ever get a match. > Looking at you swiftlocal app I see that you call > > Pattern<TQGramIndex, Swift<SwiftLocal> > pattern_swift(index_qgram); > > in the inner loop. This probably resets something in the object that is > crucial to the program. I was wondering if it wouldn't make sense to > "reuse" the already instantiated object and "just" reset what ever > required? Or is there a special reason to do it this way? I think it > used to work (with seqan release 1.2). Yes, one needed to re-initialize the pattern. Reusing the object was only possible with the semi-global version until now. But as I planned to have a look at it soon anyway, I now fixed it for the local version. > The swiftlocal app currently > doesn't compile so I couldn't just give it a go and try what happens > when the line mentioned above is initialized outside the loop. Normally, it should compile. I recently moved the file from the demos folder to the apps folder. Have you updated all files to the current version? Cheers, Birte
- References:
- Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftLocal specialization with Hamming distance
- From: "Kehr, Birte" <Birte.Kehr@fu-berlin.de>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftLocal specialization with Hamming distance - problems with WatermanEggert
- From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftLocal specialization with Hamming distance - problems with WatermanEggert
- From: "Kehr, Birte" <Birte.Kehr@fu-berlin.de>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftLocal specialization with Hamming distance - problems with WatermanEggert
- From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftLocal specialization with Hamming distance - problems with WatermanEggert
- From: "Kehr, Birte" <Birte.Kehr@fu-berlin.de>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftPattern reinit required
- From: Fabian Buske <f.buske@uq.edu.au>
- Re: [Seqan-dev] SwiftLocal specialization with Hamming distance
-
seqan-dev - May 2010 - Archives indexes sorted by:
[ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ] - Complete archive of the seqan-dev mailing list
- More info on this list...